|
Thanks Jim, I will try it and get back to you on it. Regards, LAC -----Original Message----- From: Jim Langston [mailto:jlangston@conexfreight.com] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 12:15 PM To: RPG400-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: F Specs on an OVRDBF I would suggest you go to RPG IV as soon as humanly possible. RPG IV is so much easier and faster to code than RPG III. RPG IV is actually legible too! It does not take much at all to go from RPG III to RPG IV, basically, you can take an existing RPG III program and run CVTRPGSRC on it. This will convert the source from RPG III to RPG IV by spacing out everything correctly and changing the few things that need to be changed to get it to compile. You then should be able to, in most cases, compile the program and run it without problems. There are a few problems that may crop up, but they are far and few between. The first thing you will notice is that your program has been expanded out a bit width wise. Everything should look almost the same besides that. So, you can still code like you were used to in RPG III without problems. But, now you will be able to use all the neat stuff in RPG IV. Like the Eval statement. That is the biggest change in RPG IV that makes it so great, IMO. Instead of saying: C MOVE SOMEVAR SOMEVAR2 C ADD SOMEVAR3 SOMEVAR2 You can say C Eval Somevar2 = Somevar + Somevar3 Woah, that line is actually readable! Notice, you can also use lower case letters now. And, you are no longer limited to 8 characters for variable names either! You are still limited to 8 for your DDS though, bummer. But program variables can be as long as you want them. Try it on a program or two. See what you think. Regards, Jim Langston "Cobb, Laura" wrote: > Jim, > Thanks for putting my mind at ease (LOL). My forgiving side will be okay if > it happens, but my perfectionist side is bound and determined not to let it. > Thanks for the insight on netshare400. I didn't realize I could peruse code > as well as write at the sight. Hopefully some RPGIV. I have only seen a > few statements in IV but I like what I see. It seems a bit more intuitive. > Thanks for everything and be sure that I will be seeking council in the > future from you(all) on appropriate coding techniques. > > Well its back to work for me now, > > Regards, > > LAC +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.