|
OK, i can't stand it any longer... thanks for the invitation! Bill, you're completely right in the fact that one should understand both. BUT: > 1. I cringe every time I see the same file being read at two different > points in a program. I like to see an action happening only once and only > at one point in the code. And i feel the same when i see the same condition twice, but with different op-codes. More thinking necessary, at least for me. It's much clearer for me to have the read-operation (or whatever) in one line and in the *very* next line the check whether there are records or not. To be consequent, i have to repeat the read before the ENDDO. Of course in the very line before the ENDDO. > 2. The second read statement that is coded at the end of the DOW/ENDDO > construct always seems to me to be placed after the code. I prefer to see > the read statement first, followed by the code that operates on the data > read in. Of course is it placed after the code. It's quasi the next cycle! And it's easier to read, maybe even for you, when you're honest: READ (aha, a record is read) DOW (aha, when/as long records are there is something performed) and then the READ with the ENDDO (read the next record and do the same thing again, if there is still another record) > 3. Using a DOU loop that "always executes at least once" makes sense > because I do want to always read the file at least once. OK, i do want that, too; but it's a programmer's fate to expect the unexpected - that there are no records (with the given key)! And the DOW protects me a little bit. Hopefully not too stupid 0.02 Euro Anton Gombkötö +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.