Re: Service Program Question.

[Anton Gombkötö <Gombkoetoe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Right,

i forgot to mention that there are only two activation groups in our
application - one for the startup, and one for the rest (and service
programs with *CALLER).
So it's the same in this case - there is only one eligible.

--
Anton Gombkötö

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: <Jon.Paris@halinfo.it>
An: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 07. April 2000 03:26
Betreff: RE: Service Program Question.


>
>
>  >> RCLACTGRP *ELIGIBLE can lead to unexpected results if there are
several
> activation groups going at the same time.  I believe it's safer to reclaim
them
> by name.
>
> I'm with Joel on this one.  I'm firmly of the opinion that IBM only put
> *ELIGIBLE in to simplify their own testing.  The only time I _ever_ feel
it is
> safe to use is when testing - there's too many opportunities for screw-ups
to
> use it in production.
>
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---