Re: Design question re: SrvPgm Modules & Procedures

["Joep Beckeringh" <joep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rob,

That would not seem like an argument for separate members, but an argument
for using binder source to keep the older signature (indeed time to read ILE
Concepts).

Joep Beckeringh


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Berendt" <rob@dekko.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Design question re: SrvPgm Modules & Procedures


> I still need to take the time and read the ILE concepts manual and
> understand binding better.  Or does someone recommend a session at
> COMMON that will best address this issue?
>
> I've created a huge service program with multiple subprocedures.  I
> got cute and organized them by function.  Now when I add a new
> subprocedure, in the middle, all heck breaks loose.  Normally I
> recompile every ILE program bound to that service program, shudder.
> Maybe this would be an arguement for separate members.


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---