Re: Scope of variables and subprocedures. -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I don't think it's possible.  I've only been coding subroutines which,
as you know, don't use the p-spec.

I have so much old...junk...that I have to maintain (we're talking s36
code here) that new stuff comes along without me noticing half the
time, since I'm still S36 code to make it work.

Regards,

Jim Langston

John Taylor wrote:

> Jim,
>
> How have you managed to code procedures without using the P-spec? Please
> note that the question is genuine - no sarcasm intended. Is there a way to
> do this?
>
> John Taylor
> Canada

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.