Re: Scope of variables and subprocedures.

["John Taylor" <john.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim,

How have you managed to code procedures without using the P-spec? Please
note that the question is genuine - no sarcasm intended. Is there a way to
do this?


John Taylor
Canada

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Langston" <jlangston@conexfreight.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 14:20
Subject: Re: Scope of variables and subprocedures.


> Thanks all who replied.
>
> Actually, a P spec is a totally new one on me.  I'm going
> to have to do some research on this.
>
> Thanks for all the code.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim Langston
>
> Scott Klement wrote:
>
> > <SNIP>
> > You should be able to return a value with a subprocedure.  This
> > support began in V3R2, so you should be able to do it at your
> > version.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---