Re: LVLCHK *NO

[Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Personally, I leave level check on.  The security of knowing that a program
won't run with a wrong data definition is worth more to me than the time
I would save not having to recompile the programs.

Of course, this also means that we very seldom change our DDS, which is
not a good thing.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Raul Jager wrote:

> I rather get a message telling me that the file has changed, than who
> knows what strange result.  I belive it will be practicaly impossible to
> check aver all the imlications of a change in a field, specialy output
> layout, but not less the results of arithmetic.
>
> In my opinion, if you like the lack of need to recompile when you make
> changes to your file, you can set NOLEVELCHK as default for ths file
> create.
>

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---