Re: Diff between static binding and dynamic binding

David,

Buck was drafting a "standard reply" to people who asked about
the different methods of binding, and I figured as long as I was
giving my comments on what I think he should add to his reply,
I'd add a little note about the "have" to "has" thing...

I thought it was a simple mistake, one which I probably make every
day, and it didnt even OCCUR to me that this might be a difference
in the way English is spoken in various areas of the world.

It most *CERTAINLY* was not a flame.  I'm a little astounded that
anyone could see it as a flame...  It was less than a line of text
that contained to insults or ridicules.

And I'm a bit annoyed that of the ENTIRE LONG POST I made with ideas
about the "standard reply" Buck was drafting, 3 people have picked
the whole message apart to quote back THAT ONE LITTLE LINE.  I guess
that the discussion about how to draft a standard reply regarding
ILE programming isn't as important on this list as me DARING to
say something about what I perceived as a typo.

Why am I always the bad guy?


"Kahn, David [JNJFR]" <DKahn1@JNJFR.JNJ.com> wrote:
>
> Can we all avoid grammar and spelling flames please? They're
>  distracting and
> they are likely to inhibit many people from making valuable
>  contributions.
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---