Re: CF-Spec - another call for opinions -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

dhandy@isgroup.net (Douglas Handy) wrote:
<SNIP>
> And for Callp, my suggestion is to require the trailing () when
> omitting the Callp on a subprocedure with no arguments.  This would
> safeguard the code against a future opcode by the same name, if the
> presence of () would make you treat it as an implicit CALLP instead
> an opcode.
<SNIP>

Op-Codes with operation extenders have () after them as well...
Such as chain(N) or test(D) or whatever.

Seems to me that you'd still have problems, even with the () after
the subprocedures :)



+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.