|
>> In the application i have designed i am able to replace a dynamic call with an equivalent two static(bindable) calls. I'm not quite sure what you mean here - why would you need to replace one dynamic call with two bound calls - it doesn't make sense. The only thing I can think of is that the original was a dynamic call using a variable to supply the name of the program to be called and you haven't realized that you can do a bound call in a similar fashion by using procedure pointers. Any way, the speed of a static/bound call will _always_ (RPG to RPG) be faster than a dynamic call. Whether the difference is measurable is another matter. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---END
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.