Re: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM"

[boothm@xxxxxxx]

Scott, I think you hit right on the point and you make my point exactly. 
You are skilled with both RPG and C.  However most RPG programmers are not
skilled with C and never will be, so when C-like standards begin popping
up in our faces we don't know what is happening.  For me at least it is
frightening.

And, no, I wouldn't flame you on this at all.  I envy you but realize my
destiny is RPG, not C.


In <ISUMAILR4.M00003777@as400.klements.com>, on 08/02/99 
   at 02:51 AM, "Scott Klement" <infosys@klements.com> said:


>(To the people on the list in general --  This is my opinion.  PLEASE
>don't yell at me or flame me if you disagree.  This opinion is based on
>experience training new programmers in BOTH RPG and C.  However, I
>recognize that whats easy code for me to read isn't necessarily whats
>easy for YOU to read... fair enough?)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
boothm@ibm.net
Booth Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END