Re: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM"

[boothm@xxxxxxx]

I have no feelings of being a Luddite, neo or otherwise.  I have spent too
much time chasing down really bad code from earlier attempts of others at
being on the leading edge of technical creativity.  My great dread is the
programmer with a C+ grade in his one year of C++ training in college.  I
can just see him deciding he can use the CF specs to right "real code".   

In <006a01bedacb$c58cae20$2fee0018@tcma1.wa.home.com>, on 07/30/99 
   at 01:40 PM, "Eric N. Wilson" <doulos1@home.com> said:

>I think the CF spec is the only way to keep RPG relative for the future.
>I will not let a group of Neo-Ludites stop it. I have been screaming for
>free format RPG since the S/38 came out. This is simply the MOST
>important thing that can be done to improve the RPG language. Go Toronto
>Go!

>______________________________________________
>Eric N. Wilson

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
boothm@ibm.net
Booth Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END