• Subject: Re: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM"
  • From: "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 11:17:40 -0400


IMHO, the CF-spec is one I would use as soon as it was offered.  The CX-spec was
nice, but it was always my gripe that the space allotted for the expression is
too small.

Bring on the CF-spec!

Please be more specific about: "We need many poorly designed features corrected,
we need consistent designs and several new features".

- Dan Bale

| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.