|
> > So I take it that what you are saying here is that Rochester wants to take > a product differentiator away and move us all to the same stuff that all > the other companies are using for software. Then, IBM will be able to > compete head to head at the hardware level only. Now there's a brain-dead > marketing move. Does Rochester really think IBM can compete at the > hardware level only? Do they really think they are that much smarter than > the people in the PC divisions of IBM? < Booth No, I am just saying that Rochester is very hot on SQL, However the team that is responsible for the precompiler in RPG (who don't, never did, never will) actually write RPG, doesn't see anything wrong with it most likely. The budget to make the precompiler "better" is also most likely very small. I would imagine that to them, (I'm only guessing here) the future isn't RPG but Java. So why waste money on making a "World Class" precompiler for a dying language?? John Carr * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List! To submit a new * * message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe * * from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message. Questions should * * be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.