|
Because they make more money getting people to develop with ASP, C#, VB, etc than people using Java on Windows. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Johnson" <sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users'" <pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: RE: [PcTech] Re:choosing an OS and getting comfy with a new pc > > What I don't understand is why MS doesn't step up to the plate and create a JVM > for the Windows platform and tweak the heck out of it and claim that their OSs > are the best/fastest to use when running Java apps. IBM did it with the JVM for > the iSeries and their other OSs. Why would MS want to risk losing OS sales to > competitors just because they won't include a JVM. > > -- Scott Johnson > > > > No argument. MS should't have mucked with the JVM the way > > they did. But > > that's not to say they no longer support Java, or that they > > are now working > > to make Java break. Sun said "what you've done is against the > > license" and > > MS (after arguing) said "ok, we'll stop" > > _______________________________________________ > This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list > To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech > or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.