|
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'd prefer all open source is either provided by IBM 5733OPS or via theimmensely
community (using OBS approach or other). In my eyes perzl.org is a
stepping stone on our IBMiOSS journey. That doesn't mean I don't
appreciate Perzl's efforts; but they do need to just be a stepping stone
and not a destination.
I happen to agree with all of that, but I was wondering if perzl.org
is already a destination for some people. For all I know, there is an
established AIX community who views perzl.org as their canonical
repository, and they want it to live on indefinitely. And if that's
the case, then some (even in the midrange community) might consider
efforts to rebuild any already-working-on-PASE-as-is perzl packages to
be wasteful.
Just putting it out there.
John Y.
--
This is the IBMi Open Source Roundtable (OpenSource) mailing list
To post a message email: OpenSource@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource
or email: OpenSource-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/opensource.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.