|
That is VERY interesting information Mike - thanks so much for letting us know. So did the company, in deciding to delay, at least drop the Windows choice in favor of iSeries in light of this information ? Or were the blindly insisting on that in SPITE of this information and that is what they can't afford ? Chuck -----Original Message----- From: midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike.Crump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:40 AM To: Non-Technical Discussion about the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: Microsoft targets IBM midrange server customers Actually there were a whole bunch of quotes in the article....I just about popped a vein...... Just so everyone knows we went through a SAP feasibility study here just recently...thankfully it has been delayed because we can't afford it........ 1.) Our parent company mandated Windows servers and SQL server as the standard - they call it a business requirement (I still laugh over that crap....) 2.) I now know that the iSeries makes a phenomenal SAP server - anyone that suggest otherwise does not know what they are talking about.... 3.) We priced a large hardware configuration - iSeries was slightly more expensive than an xSeries implementation - less than 2% (remember what you get with your hardware.........ahem.....just a database.....). 4.) We priced a hardware, maintenance, software, and it's maintenance. The iSeries was slightly less expensive.....approximately 5%. 5.) When we included personnel - the iSeries was cheaper by over $750,000 per year. That's right, significantly cheaper...... so.............. iSeries can't run SAP - bull iSeries can't run SAP well - bull iSeries isn't strategic to SAP - bull iSeries isn't growing with SAP - bull (actually by % it is the fastest growing platform) back to the gist of the MS comments in the article.... iSeries hardware is more expensive - sometimes yes, sometimes no - in our case it really wasn't.... iSeries is more expensive - bull - in our case it was by far the most affordable platform to run...... Customers buy Wintel platforms to save money - sometimes yes and sometime no.....in our case it would have cost us a small fortune........
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.