× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



IBM is pretty good about "leaking" technical directions for the future.
They are also very good about not leaking pricing directions.  I would
imagine that if true, we would find out on the day of announcement.  If
this were true and publicly acknowledged, current purchase/upgrade
decisions  would be put on hold immediately in the hope of a future
price decrease.

Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

> Subject: Interactive penalty? what is the latest scoop.
>
>
> > Has anybody here dissected the announcements concerning interactive
tax
> > costs.
> > Has it gone away or is it just hype? Good news for baby as/400's?
> > I went to a conference recently where Buell Duncan said they
re-thought
> the
> > interactive penalty, and it's soon to be history. Everyone clapped
> loudly!
> >
>
> I wonder why none of the trade rags have picked this up.
> Maybe they don't go to "tech" stuff?
>
> If (as Al Barsa et al. maintains) the interactive penalty is "vital"
> to IBM and to the viability of the AS/400, maybe what Buell means
> is that the AS/400 as we know it will soon be history...



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.