× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-NONTECH
  3. July 2002

Re: Interactive penalty? what is the latest scoop.

From: Andy Nolen-Parkhouse <aparkhouse@attbi.com>

> IBM is pretty good about "leaking" technical directions for the future.
> They are also very good about not leaking pricing directions.  I would
> imagine that if true, we would find out on the day of announcement.  If
> this were true and publicly acknowledged, current purchase/upgrade
> decisions  would be put on hold immediately in the hope of a future
> price decrease.

so, are you implying that
1) it is not true (either Buell lying or the poster lying)
2) Buell saying it is not "public" disclosure

I would also imagine people that have recently shelled out
big bucks for interactive would want their money back...

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.