| 
 | 
Hi Martin,
        I suppose I should have followed my remarks with < ;) >.  I did read the
article and I agree it was  positive.  I was just reacting to what Leif
posted.  It doesn't seem right to blow over os/400 in such a list and it
just reminded me of the way the 400 (oops iSeries) is often portrayed -
iSeries: Formerly the AS/400. Mini-mainframes running *AIX and Linux*.  (Not
what i usually run on it)
        I think OS/400 is the biggest asset it has and it wasn't even mentioned 
in
the box - which may be the only thing many seeing the article read.  Granted
any press is better than none, I just can't believe the 'box' didn't even
mention The os.
Regards
Rick DuVall
Systems Manager
Dealer's Auto Auction of Okc, Inc.
Rick@daaokc.com <mailto:Rick@daaokc.com>
(405) 947-2886
> Subject: RE: IBM's Mainframe Makeover
> > Sucks Don't it?  Gee, whatever happened to good old OS/400?
>
> If you read the article, rather than just the box-out, you'll find
> OS/400 mentioned in positive terms.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin.
>
> --
> Martin McCallion
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.