|
In the UK you can get phone service from the cable TV company. Seems to work fine, but again - when a line is down the normal phone company is much quicker in responding and repairing it than the cable TV company is (NTL I believe was what my grandmother had, and I experienced that first hand, even the difficulty of trying to call their support number at 11pm on a Saturday night from a phone box down the street). The cable companies still to have the attitude "oh too bad, someone can't watch their favourite TV show tonight, we'll fix it during regular business hours tomorrow, or after the weekend", whereas phone companies have more of a "the telephone is a lifeline for many people (especially elderly people, my grandmother had an emergency pendant connected via phone to a 24 hour helpline service), and a way to call emergency services, we'll send someone out at 3am in the morning to fix it if that's what's required" atitude. ...Neil Brad Jensen <brad@elstore.com> Sent by: midrange-nontech-admin@midrange.com 2002/02/25 16:13 Please respond to midrange-nontech To: midrange-nontech@midrange.com cc: Subject: Re: Question on "phone service" for lack of a better description... "Art Tostaine, Jr." wrote: > > DSL is better since you don't share, but it is often hard to get installed, and many people (like in California) were shut off with > less than a weeks notice because their carrier went out of business. > > Cable is a fine alternative for home users where DSL is not available. Not in Tulsa. I have T-1 at work and cable at home. I have 25 employees. A number of them started on DSL and went to Cable, they all love cable and would never consider going back to DSL. 'The DSL isn't shared' lie is a marketing lie. It is completely untrue. All internet access is shared, that's why it's the internet. Cable acccess is faster and more reliable, and the fact that the signals are shared at the neighborhood level rather than a mile away at the phone exchange means nothing. Nada. Zip. What matters most, beyond the initial speed where cable is far better, is the upstream bandwidth the service provider has. So far in this area, it's cable by far. And if the feds would remove the artificial barriers to home phone service, you phone service would come over your cable also, and be better quality and probably cheaper to boot. Brad Jensen
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.