|
> Folks: > > Who owns the work? > > Obviously, if programming is done on an employers time, using employers > resources (hardware, office space, software, etc), they own the code. > > However ... what if a programmer does work on his own time, using his own > resources (say, an account on Netshare400) ... but it's code ... does the > employer have any claim on the resultant code? > > A friend of mine is encountering this type of situation ... he was > presented with a new employment contract that states "Any software > developed while employed by xyz corp is the sole property of xyz corp" (or > something to that effect). This is something I have been concerned with on both sides of the transaction, as a consultant and later as a software house. Normally, if you are an employee, particularly a salaried instead of hourly employee, whatever you write (including writers who are not programmers) is considered a work for hire, and belongs to your employer, if they can show any connection whatsoever to your work. The theory is that a salaried employee is paid for their talents, and an hourly employee for their time (roughly.) This is the way the courts lean, unless you have an employment contract specifically stating your ownership of your efforts. If you are a consultant, work you do for a company is considered to be yours, unless the company has a specific contract where you grant them ownership of the code. I remember a bunch of discussion of this in the press in the early and mid 1980s. What they are asking him to sign is probably a little extreme, especially if they think to own code he writes for the internet in VB, and he programs at work in RPG, for example. He might negotiate by offering to sign a nondisclosure, and that the ownership of programs developed on company time or premises belong to them, recreational programming on his own time belongs to him. If it comes to a head, quit and let them hire him back as a consultant. He will make more money and everyone can be happy. It seems to me that most programmers of any quality that have a history with a company are more valuable than their salaries indicate. I'm not suggesting that he start playing hardball, but asking, what is this contract supposed to accomplish, and can we reach this goal with a more specific and limited agreement? seems top make sense to me. Brad Jensen Elstore.com NLS/400 is coming soon.....
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.