What are you trying to do with the blob thing?Let it live in its own "blob bubble", ie store it in db or in ifs if you than need some post processing.
bye


On Friday, January 9, 2026 at 04:33:43 PM GMT+1, Vern Hamberg via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

LOL - The "rest"of the world is not all computer professionals. IBM uses
the 1024 in its evaluation of kilobytes and megabytes and all - thus, I
believe we do know better then to follow the "rest". Especially if
making a statement of comparative size.

*Regards*

*Vern Hamberg*

IBM Champion 2025 <cid:part1.6YCgsbFX.0FTYId1b@centurylink.net> CAAC
(COMMON Americas Advisory Council) IBM Influencer 2023


On 1/9/2026 7:47 AM, Daniel Gross wrote:
Vern Hamberg:
I am sorry to have to say, but 2 GB is actually 1 more than 2,147,483,647 - still, it is more than 16 MB - I believe a GB in this context is 1024 * 3, not 1000 * 3.
It can be - and it's also my preferred calculation

    2GB = 2 * 1024 ** 3 bytes

but the rest of our world already adopted the "new" form of 2 * 1000 ** 3 - just ask Google "How many bytes in 2GB" and your answer will be

    2GB = 2000000000 bytes

Anyway - those 2GB (or 2.14GB however we like to see it) are hopefully enough.

Regards,
Daniel

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.