|
+1! --I wish.. Some companies (like mine) have too much "legacy code" and think having budgets means you can't do such an immense overhaul of all that old code. The company I work did a couple of years of having people modernize old code, but only when an assignment brought a program across your screen.-snip-
Another programmer said he thought they should just assign a few to modernize the code. I agree with that. Sure it's lots of code but they went with a third party implementation. It didn't cover everything so they got a discount to help the vendor add the missing funcionality. Projected time to finish was 10 years. (They started out saying 2 years hahahaha--been there done that)..
Sometimes I wonder how many machines are still on "i". This company's new software is not on the "i".
It's a big company, but they're not going to renew the RDi license. IBM is pricing itself out. Best thing they did was adapting open source.
I will be glad when patents and copyright gets put to death.
--Alan
On 05/23/2025 12:20 PM EDT Marco Facchinetti<marco.facchinetti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I can't believe you people are still talking about 5250.
Please, let it fade away.
Best regards
--
Marco Facchinetti
Mr S.r.l.
Tel. 035 962885
Cel. 393 9620498
Skype: facchinettimarco
Il giorno ven 23 mag 2025 alle ore 17:17 Vern Hamberg via MIDRANGE-L <
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.