Re: IFS ownership

I don't have any trouble understanding the need.
I use SELinux (and IBM i authorities in conjunction with the IFS) which is much the same thing.
I have trouble with some of the misuse I've seen in the field.
And I stand by my assertion that most use cases don't require special intervention from the IBM i LIC authorities scheme and can be sufficiently handled with the Unix permissions in the IFS.

________________________________
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Vern Hamberg via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 13:14
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IFS ownership

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Margaret Fenlon has several presentations at COMMON, might have been a
boot camp. She explains the need for multiple security models in the IFS.
--

*Regards*

*Vern Hamberg*



Jack Woehr
Independent Consulting Programmer

303-847-8442

jack.woehr@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.procern.com

Stay Connected!

Not Just MSP, We Also MSSP.

 NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE: This communication including any and all attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further distribution or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy all copies of this communication immediately.