× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. July 2024

Re: is this the correct understanding for commitment control running in ILE?

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:41 PM Jay Vaughn <jeffersonvaughn@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

IF there is a critical error, the monitor in pgmA catches it and the
rollback occurs – everything is rolled back, pgm ends as well as the *NEW
actgrp commitment control boundary.


Correct.


If pgmA finishes successfully, a commit does not even have to be specified,
as *NEW defines the commitment boundary.

When pgmA ends, so does the *NEW actgrp boundary (as well as the commitment
control boundary). – all i/o’s are committed.


Very much incorrect. If pgmA ends, and COMMIT has not been issued, then
the system will automatically roll-back the changes.

In other words, you must explicitly issue a COMMIT to have the transaction
commitmented.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.