|
On 3 Apr 2023, at 21:32, Patrik Schindler wrote:
You’d need to climb very high up the ladder within a large corp to find some_one_ with that power. Someone in the middle of the org has to weigh what to use own resources for, and which battles to fight (upstream). As there is little gain for them, the choice may very well be "I won’t touch this" or "not worth arguing". It would be different, if you’d be a section 509 org, or a honorable club (CHM or similar); such things would make it a bit easier to succeed.It's the Humans with Law Degrees that are the problem. they make (andYes, you've nailed it. And if I could get one of these to hear me out, he can decide if and how to break those ruled in my favor. ;-)
break) said rules.
Been there, done that (*)
(And I disagree with the "it’s the lawyers fault only!". The problem is IMHO a specific mindset. You’ll find this with lawyers, but also with IT —and other— folks.)
Regards
Götz
(*) I’m neither within IBM, nor a lawyer. But in a S&P500/NASDAQ100 corp.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.