RE: Question on effectiveness of additional processors -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Question on effectiveness of additional processors
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:50:44 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yeah, if you're really old on PTF's then you would be better off to get a new I_BASE... cd downloaded, a new B_ cd downloaded, and all the new ptfs IN ADDITION, and following the instructions here to apply that new I_BASE and B_:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.3?topic=iudirs-replacing-licensed-internal-code-i-same-version-release

See also
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/687319

otherwise jumping several TR's can get hairy.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.