RE: Question on effectiveness of additional processors -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Question on effectiveness of additional processors
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:25:43 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Jim's comments still stand.

What release(s) are you running?
Do you keep current on PTFs?
The reason I ask is that there are some charts in the New Navigator at http://youribmi:2002/Navigator , Performance, Graph History which may help
Then again I still get baffled by what is an acceptable page faulting. I think that's an ever evolving number.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Question on effectiveness of additional processors , a4g atl

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.