Re: Index over QSYS/QADBXREF -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Index over QSYS/QADBXREF
From: Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 12:59:26 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That was my initial reaction, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't being
overly paranoid. Thank you

date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:23:12 +0000

from: MidrangeL <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Index over QSYS/QADBXREF

That would not be my first choice. You are in effect changing an IBM
supplied system object (tangentially anyway) so while I can see the
recommendation being made, that one I would ignore. Will it hurt,
likely not, then again.....

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.