× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


Since you are using an IBM supplied table function, or view, or whatever, (QSYS2.RECORD_LOCK_INFO), open a "PMR" or "case" with IBM Support to report this as a problem, and suggest that IBM should "fix" this.

All the best,

Mark S. Waterbury

On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 10:19:50 AM EDT, Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

VE is recommending an index over QSYS/QADBXREF.  The query in question is using QSYS2.RECORD_LOCK_INFO.  I've never seen an index recommended over a QSYS table before.  Is it a bad idea to create indexes over QSYS tables (they'd be in a diff schema of course).


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2023 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.