× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thomas,

On the primary LPAR that hosts the other LPARs, what percentage of total DASD was in use, prior to the failure?  And, how many DASD drives are in that system?  Is it "maxed out" with no available slots to add additional DASD?  

If the total DASD usage was > 75% you will likely not have enough space to restore everything on the same DASD after configuring RAID-5 or RAID-6.  As others have mentioned, you will lose the equivalent of one drive for RAID-5 and two drives for RAID-6 "striping" etc.
So, you might need to restore the entire system as non-RAID protected, and then figure out how much space is used, and back up each LPAR separately, and decide what data can be moved "elsewhere" (e.g. for example move IFS data to a SAN/NAS device accessed via NFS etc., to reduce the total storage consumption to allow for RAID protection.

Hope that helps,
Mark S. Waterbury

On Friday, January 8, 2021, 10:35:47 AM EST, Thomas Garvey <tgarvey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks, everyone.

I think I'm hosed on this. RAID is not enabled and the drive is failed.
Replacing the drive means whatever was on the failed drive is gone,
including whatever part of the OS it's still trying to execute in the
IPL. So, my system is corrupted.
So, we'll have to de-configure and remove the bad drive, insert the new
drive, configure it, enable RAID and load the entire system and
libraries from our system save tape.
One last question: if my system save is from a server which did NOT have
RAID enabled, will my system be restored as RAID enabled?  I mean,
what's on my tape does not have the extra parity bit, so when the system
is restored will the restore put it back with a parity bit because the
server itself is now RAID enabled? Am I making sense?

Best Regards,

Thomas Garvey


On 1/8/2021 9:12 AM, Patrik Schindler wrote:
Hello Thomas,

Am 08.01.2021 um 15:39 schrieb Thomas Garvey <tgarvey@xxxxxxxxxx>:

Why would IBM deliver a box with RAID capability and not configure it?
Misunderstanding? Or maybe there was a RAID5-Setup-Specify not being satisfied with the order? Or it’s really a customer thing, but I doubt it.

Is it possible RAID5 was our responsibility?
Honestly: Clarify with your dealer. He should be able to tell.

Can it be set up AFTER the OS and Licensed software is installed by IBM?
Yes, as long as there’s enough free space: You’ll lose one disk worth of capacity to the checksums of RAID5.

:wq! PoC


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.