×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hello Rob,
Am 27.07.2020 um 13:17 schrieb Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>:
I will say that the SAVRST* have some legitimate use and I really wish they'd rewrite those for TCP/IP.
Why not put up an RFE? Besides, I'm positive you can fake object connect facilities over IP with a temporary save file and creative use of scp or even ssh (to start the remote rst process).
Hm. I feel as if we had discussed this topic in the pastime, especially with my remark about ssh.
I just didn't want to put SNA back in once I gutted it out.
What's the point? EE APPN Controller descriptions are so very easily created and deleted. And with connection network support, it's even more easy to handle when multiple machines are involved.
I don't understand why you seem so appalled to SNA. It has its uses, as you admit. For me it's most interesting because I get more data copied between my 150 to/from other systems, compared to using ftp over IP which is hogging the CPU at 100% even with 10M Ethernet. And SNA uses just about 30% CPU over Token Ring. Maybe I'll revisit the alerts topic to have a central means of being notified about certain conditions.
:wq! PoC
PGP-Key: DDD3 4ABF 6413 38DE -
https://www.pocnet.net/poc-key.asc
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
