× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Here is where you're confused.
A VTL is NOT equal to a virtual tape device. No comparison.
A VTL (Virtual Tape Library) is a separate appliance. It is not a just space on disk to store image catalog entries for use with virtual tape devices.
A virtual tape device is something you configure with CRTDEVTAP DEVD(TAPVRT01) RSRCNAME(*VRT)
A VTL which integrates nicely with BRMS and existing IBM i commands requires a fiber channel card. Some low end models which use their own commands may connect with TCP/IP.

A VTL can have multiple (hundreds) different tape volumes in it's library just like the big IBM physical tape libraries can have. When BRMS says mount U00123 it will go find that volume load it up and process it. A virtual tape device cannot do that.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.