× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'll have 15K HDD. I couldn't justify the higher purchase price for SSD's, plus we keep hardware past the warranty period so maintenance costs would have been a killer.



-----Original Message-----
From: Steinmetz, Paul via MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 1:19 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Full save to virtual tape?

I also use LTO7.
My disks are the most busy during a save.
Disk response increases 8x or more.

Your DASD subsystem also is a major factor.
On our old P7 R&D LPAR with 10k spinny disks, backing up to LTO7, the disks could not keep up with the LTO7 tape, disk response time now also included wait time.

We're now on P9, 100% SSD, both LPARS.
Disk response time is still 8x during a save.

A while back I tested Virtual tape.
As Rob stated, it was slower, the disks were super busy.

Paul


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.