× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Actually SAVSTG was a way to do kind of bit image save. Really only usable if you restored to an exactly configured machine. Although I did know of a company which used it to grind out new machines. Learned that at a "multiples" session at COMMON a LONG time ago.
You could not restore individual objects from a SAVSTG.

SAVSTG is no longer a valid command. I forget which release dropped it. It had such a limited environment and IBM probably suffered from one too many fool who was using that as their full system save.

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Justin Taylor
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:14 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Full save to virtual tape?

IBM i virtual tape
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/ssw_ibm_i_73/rzam4/rzam4virtualtape.htm

It looks like a full save doesn't do SAVSTG, so we should be good.


We'd immediately DUPTAP to a physical tape. The use of virtual tape would be to shorten the system downtime. The question remains whether the time gain would be significant enough to bother.

Thanks



-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 8:54 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Full save to virtual tape?

I assume by "virtual tape" you are not talking about a VTL, or Virtual Tape Library. But, instead you are talking about CRTDEVTAP DEVD(TAPVRT01) RSRCNAME(*VRT) ASSIGN(*YES)

With VTL, I do it all the time. With the TAPVRT01 thing, I've not tried a full system save.
I assume you know the downfall of this thing, like, how would you restore from that, etc. And you plan on FTPing that to another system and doing a DUPTAP to other tape. Like before we had VTL and we wanted to do a remote save, FTP it over to another system and do a DUPMEDBRM there. Yes, BRMS recognizes these virtual tapes, and plays well with them. We normally used them for less than full system saves though.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.