Re: Server comparison -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

True that. It is a well publicized limit as well. This effectively means it's a great box for hosting providers but less useful for customers with a need for a low number of larger partitions. Those may hit that 4 core limit.

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 9/22/2018 10:06 AM, Holger Scherer wrote:

By the way - the S822 is limited to 4 cores per LPAR. Just had a customer who ran into this...

-h

<VendorResponse/2>There is several hosting companies for finding out the right sizing, but i assume latency from your site will be better with a US based hoster :)</VendorResponse/2>

Am 22.09.2018 um 14:28 schrieb DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

As has been noted there is basically '2U' of difference :-)

The S812 cannot be virtualized either so if you find out you need a separate partition for any reason, you can't.

Do be aware there is also an S822, also a 2 box, which CAN be virtualized but given the size you're mentioning is likely a bit of overkill.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.