× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



< The best comparison is to read the file twice (getting times for
each read-through) before comparing to a read-through with SETOBJACC.

Actually did this.
2nd time through was also 14 minutes.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of dlclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 3:42 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Memory pool , object question

"MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04/06/2018
03:32:42 PM:
Do you have any time savings of your use of SETOBJACC?

I created a 400,000,000 record test file.
Created a simple test program, read the file, beginning to end.
14 minutes to read all 400,000,000 million records.

SETOBJACC OBJ(PAULS/CCEKCPP) OBJTYPE(*FILE) POOL(*SHRPOOL1) 46877104K
of CCEKCPP brought to pool with 25441484K unused.

Reran the same test program.
11 minutes to read 400,000,000 million records.

SETOBJACC OBJ(PAULS/CCEKCPP) OBJTYPE(*FILE) POOL(*PURGE) Member
CCEKCPP purged from main storage.


The best comparison is to read the file twice (getting times for
each read-through) before comparing to a read-through with SETOBJACC.


Sincerely,

Dave Clark

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.