On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Vernon Hamberg
<vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since John doesn't have RDi - and proudly, it seems - I don't see that his
comments have meaning - the things he says should be there - mostly ARE!
I'm neither proud nor ashamed of not having RDi. It's just a fact that I don't.
I also never said RDi "should" do this or that. I expressed some of my
opinions on the CL language and how I prefer to format it. The most
significant of those opinions (because it's the only opinion that was
controversial) was that I prefer not to use all the keywords. No one
has said that RDi can accommodate this preference any better or
differently than SEU can.
It's very dismissive and disrespectful of you to say that my comments
don't have meaning.
Man, get a copy of RDi and look before leaping into comments about it,
please!!
My comments about RDi are never of the form "RDi sucks because..." or
"RDi is missing this essential feature" or "why doesn't RDi do such
and such?". If you would actually take the time to read and understand
what I write, you'll see my comments are always of the form "well,
does RDi do such and such?" or "from what RDi users are saying, it
sounds to me as though...". So if I'm misunderstanding something that
someone else wrote about RDi, then how about setting me straight? It's
of course your prerogative to simply respond that you're not going to
answer any questions from anyone "outside the club". Fine. You don't
have to be disrespectful about it, though. Better just to not respond
at all.
John Y.
midrange.com
