|
I think one of the biggest problems is that people have this belief that
the user id's and passwords between IBM i and Windows should not match.
That it increases security if they do not match. Some are under the
belief that Windows is this huge security hole.
My argument is that this drastically increases complexity and really does
not increase security. What you end up doing is creating local profiles
with passwords which never change and other things which are a gross
security violation. Basically, what you think is increasing security is
actually DECREASING security.
That and IBM i, as shipped, is not much more secure.
crtusrprf dummy password(xyz)
STRCMNTRC CFGOBJ(LANLIN) CFGTYPE(*LIN)
TELNET thislpar
Sign on as DUMMY
ENDCMNTRC CFGOBJ(LANLIN) CFGTYPE(*LIN)
PRTCMNTRC CFGOBJ(LANLIN) CFGTYPE(*LIN) FMTTCP(*YES)
DSPSPLF FILE(QPCSMPRT) SPLNBR(*LAST)
.DUMMY...XYZ.
Of course, you have to look at the hex data at the left to get the correct
case
C4E4D4D4E8110735 A7A8A9FFEF
Basically any fool with a sniffer can get that data.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.