×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 15-May-2017 14:30 -0600, Versfelt, Charles wrote:
subject: RE: FTP issue Authentication (Rich Loeber)
Are you going to IBM i?
Then I suspect you forgot to change from namefmt 0 to namefmt 1 and
it's trying to put a csv file into the qsys.lib file system.
Or, you are using namefmt 1 but you are trying to go to /qdls and
that crap only supports 8.3
Rob Berendt
Charles,
The above quoted text is quite confusing, because the attributions
are incorrect; despite being sent by you, your portion of the message
was "lost", due to, in combination, posting without NNTP-style quoting,
and bottom-quoting. See how in the archive, just as in the above quoted
text, you appear to have posted only/exactly what Rob posted, even
appearing to sign the message as "Rob":
[
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201705/msg00450.html]
While I am in no way [any longer] a fan of top-posting, if you
bottom-post *and* there is an end-of-signature line preceding your text,
then _minimally_, remove the line with the two dashes followed by a space.
A copy of your message does appear in the archives, copied by Jeff's
email client [my NNTP ignores text after the signature-indicator] in the
following archived message; note the gray vertical bar on the left,
showing the "quoting" of your message that did not properly quote Rob's
message:
[
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201705/msg00451.html]
Better than just being sure to trim the signature denotation, IMO, is
to ensure use of the proper quoting [i.e. preceding each line with a
less-than sign and a space], such that the messages appear correctly in
the archives; i.e. so the text in a message is conspicuously associated
with a particular author. FWiW, IMO, ditching the digest versions, and
just using an NNTP or email client to group/organize the messages
greatly simplifies; minimally, as improvements, there is no need to
"fix" the subject line [which some posts added some extraneous "RE:"]
nor trim out so much unrelated text, as the "reply" feature should
automate both the continuum of the subject line *and* contextual quoting.
midrange.com
