Re: Node.JS Was: New lower cost IBM i announced -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I care only if I can access the functionality from an RPG program via

CALL/PARM or CALLP/sub-procedure. The things we can execute that way are
'IBM i' and the things we cannot are 'PASE'.

So what consider when calling directly, via api, PASE C libs?
http://yips.idevcloud.com/wiki/index.php/PASE/LIBPASE

Aaron Bartell
IBM i hosting, starting at $157/month. litmis.com/spaces

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2/14/2017 3:41 PM, Evan Harris wrote:

Having more machine instructions than you would like is a vastly

different

statement than "doesn't run on the i".

He's choosing to draw a line between 'native' IBM i and PASE.

At home, I write machine code for PIC micros, so I can definitely
appreciate that line. However, at work, I'm an application programmer.
I don't care whether a given 'machine instruction' executes in
horizontal, vertical, PASE, or 'native IBM i'. I care only if I can
access the functionality from an RPG program via CALL/PARM or
CALLP/sub-procedure.

The things we can execute that way are 'IBM i' and the things we cannot
are 'PASE'.

--
--buck

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.