Virtual tape - Performance difference between LTO 3 & LTO5 -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Virtual tape - Performance difference between LTO 3 & LTO5
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:23:29 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Question came up on serverfault...

I don't believe there's any performance difference between virtual LTO3 &
LTO5. I suspect both perform as fast as the disk subsystem allows.

Can anyone confirm or correct me?

Thanks!
Charles

Follow-Ups:

RE: Virtual tape - Performance difference between LTO 3 & LTO5 , Pete Massiello - ML
Re: Virtual tape - Performance difference between LTO 3 & LTO5 , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.