RE: Loading Image Catalog

OK if it's all on the backplane then the network will never see the traffic.
It's 100% virtual between the partitions. I'm confused by your set up if
the LAN/WAN guy needs to even know about the network.

Yes, full duplex is a problem. Leave it at the defaults. Traffic is only
going one way for the most part anyway.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob
Berendt
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:56 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Loading Image Catalog

I ran this on the host:
ENDNFSSVR SERVER(*ALL)
STRNFSSVR SERVER(*ALL)

When I run this on the host:
ping '10.10.206.129'
it fails.
I suspect the network guy figured that '206' is all backplane and doesn't
need to be put in the routers and/or switches.

Makes me wonder if I should pursue this more vigoursly.
<snip>
If you use all Vlans on the backplane of the system you'll eliminate quite a
bit trouble.
</snip>
Like, should I reverse this change, bounce NFS, and try it again? Heck, try
the ping?
<snip>
Internet address . . . . . . 10.10.206.129
Gateway router address . . . 10.10.206.1
Subnet mask . . . . . . . . . 255.255.255.0 to
Internet address . . . . . . 10.10.6.130
Gateway router address . . . 10.10.6.1
Subnet mask . . . . . . . . . 255.255.254.0
*Note: we use subnet 255.255.254.0 for our regular lan traffic.
</snip>
I did not put that original '10.10.206.1' in there. It put that in itself.
Is this like a dummy router vlan uses? Or does it assume that I have a
router with that IP address? It kinda follows our standards.
Should I be able to ping '10.10.206.1'? Right now I can't ping that from
guest or host.

Changing the default of HALF duplex to full duplex on the SST service lan
isn't a problem, is it? They match on both the host and guest.


Rob Berendt