To add what has already been said...
We use it only because our primary vendor software uses it (actually they
embedded another software piece DTM, which was a replacement for
It's in the plan to upgrade but it's complicated when you write many
thousands of docs per month and you have to keep them "forever" (not just
offline storage, but easily retrieved and reference (insurance)). We have
many more than can fit in a single ASP, so many ASPs.
Even though IBM may not like adding the support into each future release, I
think they realize some large clients still need the support.
Small shops might have a couple apps writing docs. We may have 100 or more.
We've moved all file import and exports out of QDLS long ago, but left with
the "word-like" docs.
It is what happens when you are a fairly early adopter (in the 90's)
customize so much it's hard to upgrade, so you sit on older versions of
packaged software, and write all kinds of stuff around it...

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2015 6:48 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: DLO

We moved away from the use of SNDDST and use the APIs for sending mail. But
doesn't that still need to use SMTP and MSF?
From: MIDRANGE-L [midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Bradley
Stone [bvstone@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2015 5:27 PM
view the archives at

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].