× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



We've got four customers. One on an MMB, one on an E4D, one on an E4B, and one on a 41A. (And no, they didn't all walk into a bar together.)

Tomcat performance on the 41A and the E4D is quite fast. Faster than on our own E4A.

Tomcat performance on the MMB and the E4B is quite slow. Much slower than our own E4A.

The 41A and the E4D have Tomcat running in subsystems with private pools of size 2097152-2200000 and activity level 200

The MMB has Tomcat running in QCTL (why am I thinking that was a bad idea), while the E4B is in a subsystem with a private pool of size 3200000 and activity level 200.

Anybody have any insights?

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.