Re: Running SQL Workbench console from PASE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Running SQL Workbench console from PASE
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:12:44 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:28 AM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Numerous times the one that is less standards based worked with more of
the examples I found on the internet. Perhaps it's due to more people
using 'extensions' instead of limitations caused by the standards not
keeping up?

Which one are you saying is "less standards based"? One of my main
points is that it doesn't even make sense to express the differences
between Qshell and PASE in those terms.

You might equally accurately say that neither is standards-based, or
that both are standards-based, or that "true" standards-based examples
are basically nonexistent on the Internet.

John Y.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Running SQL Workbench console from PASE , Justin Dearing

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].