× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. August 2015

Re: Failed GO SAVE 21

On 31-Aug-2015 15:11 -0600, John McKee wrote:
<<SNIP>> I also looked at the system reply list entries and only the
first four had either C or D. Some issue there. the message ids
for those messages are: CPA0700, RPG0000, CBE0000 and PLI0000.
Message CPA0700 is not in QCPFMSG. Maybe it was an an earlier
release?

The XXX##00 format of the Reply List entry represents a /generic/ specification rather than a specific message, indicating that all messages with the prefix XXX and the first two digits ## will be selected as a match; e.g. for CPA0700, that suggests any message with prefix CPA and the first two digits 07 are represented as capable of being intercepted for reply list inquiry handling (INQMSGRPY).

In any event, I can't see why the tape change does not work. It is
very discouraging.

Seems probable the missing PTF as preventive for a High-Impact-Pervasive issue could be the reason; a timing issue leading to unpredictable results, thus the HIPer designation.?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.