Re: web navigator vs fat client navigator.

I had reinstalled 7.1 Nav on Win7 recently and had issues with some folders
not expanding and hence being completely useless. I then realised that I
hadn't installed the latest PTFs.
So I downloaded SI50567 and applied it and the app is hummimg - never had a
better experience.
Oh yes, I also had to download a fix for a missing DLL - icuuc44.dll
I also had upgraded Java:
[image: Inline images 1]
This also fixed the issue where I could never connect to Management Central
- kept on blowing Navigator out of the water.

Happy as a p.g in ....!

Cheers
Paul

On 25 April 2015 at 07:36, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Strange, I find the 7.1 iNav on Win7 to be the most reliable I've ever
used.



-----Original Message-----
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:31 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: web navigator vs fat client navigator.

My boss and I get totally lost trying to use the web navigator for
performance evaluation versus the fat client.
It's really hurting now that we're on Windows 7 and the fat client keeps
blowing up before I get very far into it. YMMV. Perhaps it's dependent on
java version, etc. I need to open a ticket on this.


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail
to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.