web navigator vs fat client navigator. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: web navigator vs fat client navigator.
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:30:52 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

My boss and I get totally lost trying to use the web navigator for
performance evaluation versus the fat client.
It's really hurting now that we're on Windows 7 and the fat client keeps
blowing up before I get very far into it. YMMV. Perhaps it's dependent
on java version, etc. I need to open a ticket on this.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: web navigator vs fat client navigator. , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.